<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PingMag - The Tokyo-based magazine about</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.packetlust.com/archives/77/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.packetlust.com/archives/77</link>
	<description>"Like milk just before it goes out of date, tangy but not unpleasant" -- Holly</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gatt</title>
		<link>http://www.packetlust.com/archives/77/comment-page-1#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>gatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 02:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.packetlust.com/archives/77#comment-80</guid>
		<description>This is neat, I've done it several times, but usually just two exposures.  Its really easy to take two pictures about 2 stops apart and get an excellent result closer to how the eye actually sees.  Those pics go a little farther then that.  With almost no shadows they look really unnatural.  

For Digital cameras you can't go wrong with a Canon, 10D 20D are good deals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is neat, I&#8217;ve done it several times, but usually just two exposures.  Its really easy to take two pictures about 2 stops apart and get an excellent result closer to how the eye actually sees.  Those pics go a little farther then that.  With almost no shadows they look really unnatural.  </p>
<p>For Digital cameras you can&#8217;t go wrong with a Canon, 10D 20D are good deals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
